Elon Musk is leveraging one of the most anticipated IPOs in history to drive adoption of his AI product, Grok.
According to reporting from the Financial Times, Musk has required “banks, law firms and other advisers working on the SpaceX IPO to purchase enterprise subscriptions to Grok,” his chatbot developed by xAI. Some institutions have already agreed to spend “tens of millions of dollars” and begun integrating the software internally. Musk also pushed banks to increase advertising on X, though the FT notes he was “less forceful” on that demand.
The leverage is obvious, and enormous.
The SpaceX offering is expected to raise more than $50 billion at a valuation exceeding $1 trillion, a transaction that could generate upwards of $500 million in advisory fees. After a prolonged drought in large-scale IPOs, Wall Street firms are competing aggressively for roles on the deal. As one FT source put it, “no bank wants to be left out of this.”
That dynamic has given Musk unusual bargaining power. Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, Bank of America and Citigroup are all reportedly involved, institutions that, under normal circumstances, would dictate terms rather than accept them.
Instead, they are buying.
Strategically, the move allows Musk to reshape the narrative around Grok ahead of the IPO filing. The product currently trails rivals like OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Anthropic’s Claude, and Google’s Gemini in enterprise adoption. xAI has reported roughly $1 billion in AI-related revenue, much of it consumer-driven. Forcing large financial institutions into enterprise contracts helps reposition Grok as a serious B2B contender just before public market scrutiny intensifies.
This tactic fits a broader pattern. Musk has repeatedly used the gravitational pull of one venture to reinforce another, whether cross-promoting Tesla, SpaceX, or X.
But this instance carries additional controversy.
Grok has faced regulatory scrutiny and restrictions in several jurisdictions over problematic outputs, including the generation of “sexualised content involving minors” and “antisemitic material,” according to prior reporting cited by the FT. That makes the requirement less a standard commercial upsell and more a reputational trade-off for participating banks.
The fact that firms still agreed underscores the power imbalance at play.
Or, more bluntly: when the largest IPO in history is on the table, even Wall Street’s biggest institutions are willing to accept terms they would normally reject.
Source: